By
most indicators, and opinions, our democratic representative republic is on the down slide. As
a rule, things aren't getting better for most Americans. Both the Left and
Right seem to sense this, but for different reasons, of course.
Those
on the Right will say we are being destroyed by “Big Government” regulations, social
programs and safety nets. The GOP is now attacking Social Security, food
stamps, minimum wage and unemployment compensation. Republicans are pushing to
further unleash Wall Street from rules and oversight. Their base is also furious
with marriage equality and their perception that we are losing our “values” as
a nation.
Democracy and equality seem off their radar as part of those values.
Most
Americans disagree, and again, as with the GOP takeover of the House, most
Americans voted for a democrat senator. Such are the anti-democratic flaws of
gerrymandering and disproportionate representation in both Houses.
Those
on the Left say our nation is being destroyed by deregulated capitalism, militarism,
militarized law enforcement, and the surveillance state. They see the corporatism
built by corporate “personhood” and the dominance of their “free speech” money. They
see corporate written trade agreements becoming law of the land. This has done
more for trickle up wealth and off-shore jobs than for the American people.
Both parties are playing this game.
The
divide and conquer tactics utilized by the economically powerful have been a
great success. Both major parties are largely bought and paid for, as a rule.
This
brings us to a curious exception to the rule.
Before
9-11 and the fear-mongering behind the “war on terror” shook Americans from reason
and judgment, the war on drugs was doing the same damage to our basic freedoms.
Besides
the futility and brutality of the war on drugs, we saw the encroachments on
civil liberties through “no-knock” laws, passive acceptance of intrusive random
drug testing, and more frightening of all, civil asset forfeiture. Law
enforcement was granted the power of “legal” piracy. They could take your money
and property without proof of wrongdoing. All they had to say was they
suspected the money or property was related to drug dealing.
It
is an outrage that has nothing to do with justice. That’s what police states
do.
So
as a rule, the police state is expanding. Now a curious and welcome exception
to the rule is unfolding. Voices from diverse perspectives are joining the
effort to end the piracy.
Two dozen civil liberties activists, legal specialists
and Capitol Hill staffers from across the political spectrum convened Thursday
to discuss reforms for civil asset-forfeiture laws, which allow local and state
police to take cash and property from Americans without proving a crime has
occurred.
Representatives of the Institute for Justice, the
American Civil Liberties Union, the American Bar Association, the Cato
Institute and the Heritage Foundation, along with congressional staffers from
both parties, strategized on possible legislative remedies to curb abuses.
Imagine that. Addressing blatant corruption and injustice
by law enforcement has become a common cause.
Now it has come to this:
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without proving that a crime occurred.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without proving that a crime occurred.
Holder’s action represents the most sweeping check on
police power to confiscate personal property since the seizures began three
decades ago as part of the war on drugs.
But what about the elected officials?
Last Friday, Sens. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Mike
Lee (R-Utah), along with Reps. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) and John
Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), signed a letter calling on Holder to end Equitable
Sharing.
A rare and stunning glimpse of bi-partisan sanity.
Take a picture; it won’t last.
Unfortunately states still have asset forfeiture laws.
The fact the revenue largely goes to a general fund instead of the law
enforcement agencies is some disincentive for abuse.
It’s amazing what can happen when both sides see an issue
unclouded by propaganda and corporate PR. This is what real progress looks
like.